Comments on: I want candy! I want caaandy!

By: ArchangelRobriel

ArchangelRobriel — Tue, 08 Jan 2008 05:03:49 +0000

You’re going to be here in February, so it’s not really all that brave, actually. And you know I loves you.

By: Jeremy

Jeremy — Tue, 08 Jan 2008 00:08:42 +0000

Oh, bitch, NO YOU DI’INT just go at me. It’s done been BROUGHTEN. I’m surprised that you didn’t feel the air pressure drop when I gasped. You’re awfully brave when you’re a continent away….

By: ArchangelRobriel

ArchangelRobriel — Mon, 07 Jan 2008 21:46:46 +0000

Oh definitely Shields and Yarnell. That connection really needs to be made and publicized. That’s an excellent observation. I haven’t thought of them since…1982? *laugh*
I’m thinking that sometime soon, she’s going to come out in rainbow striped toe socks, clogs with a denim skirt and a fringed jacket. With big, chunky, plastic jewelry. And maybe she could tie her spiral permed hair up in a big pastel scrunchy or a banana clip!
The sad part is that if she really worked the 80’s kitsch thing, she could at least go somewhat farther afield and pull together something interesting as opposed to the fairly consistent Muffy B. Tepperman rut she seems to be stuck in.

By: Dana Detrick-Clark from Serious Vanity Music

Dana Detrick-Clark from Serious Vanity Music — Mon, 07 Jan 2008 20:59:37 +0000

I have to fixate on Jillian for a moment. First: “MORK!” I screamed this as soon as she appeared onscreen, and am so glad I’m not the only one who saw the obvious comparison. Why didn’t she just reference Orson for help when her bodice wouldn’t work? Though, there was something a little Shields and Yarnell about that getup too. I think her ultimate fashion icon, though, must be the pre-Ross incarnation of Rachel from “Friends”. So much denim. And you know eventually, she’s going to have something where the shoes match the tights match the skirt. She’s a 90’s rebel.